Sunday, November 30, 2025

Medicines Tax Renders UK Unattractive for Pharmaceutical Investment

Leaders from Across a Key Growth Sector Warn of UK Investment Crisis Without Levy Reform

In a dimly lit boardroom overlooking the Thames, a group of industry leaders gathers around a polished table, their faces etched with concern. Tensions are palpable as they deliberate the impending ramifications of a newly revised government levy on pharmaceutical companies—one that is widely perceived as an unsustainable economic burden. With investment plans on shaky ground, the future of life sciences in the UK hangs in the balance.

The Call for Urgent Action

Leaders from major global pharmaceutical firms, including AstraZeneca and Pfizer, have voiced their fears that the UK government’s ambitious industrial strategy focusing on life sciences could crumble unless radical changes are made to the current payment scheme for drug manufacturers. The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) has issued a fervent plea, urging ministers to reconsider a financial structure that now demands companies to fork over between 23.5% and an alarming 35.6% of their total sales revenue from branded medications to the National Health Service (NHS).

  • Competitive Rates:** Calls to revise payment rates to align with international standards, which average around 7% in countries like France and Germany.
  • Decades of Disinvestment:** The UK has seen a decline in investment in innovative medicines, contributing to its position as an international outlier.
  • NHS Budget Surge:** Despite a 33% increase in the NHS budget, the domestic branded medicine market has stagnated, signaling deeper systemic issues.

A Strained Ecosystem

The pharmaceutical industry currently contributes over £17.6 billion in direct gross value added (GVA) to the UK economy. However, companies warn this potential is dampened by unsustainable financial demands. “The current rebate structure penalizes innovation rather than promoting it,” laments Richard Torbett, Chief Executive of ABPI. “Unless these excessive payment rates are addressed, investment will evaporate, and the NHS will lag further behind our global counterparts.”

Figures tell a grim story: growth in the branded medicine sector has stagnated at a range of 1.1% to 2% annually between 2014 and 2023, while the NHS budget has surged almost in tandem, with real terms growth of 33% during the same period. Unfortunately, the UK has fallen from first place to ninth in the availability of new medicines across Europe—a decline that starkly mirrors diminishing public health outcomes.

Industry Leader Perspectives

Leaders from various pharmaceutical giants have echoed similar sentiments, presenting a united front in this urgent plea for reform. “The UK has always been a beacon of innovation in the life sciences, yet we’re becoming an afterthought on the global stage,” argues Tom Keith Roach, President of AstraZeneca UK. “Unless we cultivate a commercial environment that reflects our ambition, we risk losing our competitive edge.”

Similarly, Kylie Bromley, Vice President of Biogen UK, notes, “The unpredictability of the rebate has made it increasingly challenging to justify investment in the UK. It’s disheartening to see the UK positioned as a laggard while other nations race ahead.” The contrasts are stark: while the UK hovers around a 23.5% payment rate, countries like Germany and Ireland are operating with a much lighter burden, averaging just 7% to 9%.

Where Do We Go From Here?

The pressure mounts as industry experts propose solutions to amend the Voluntary Scheme for Branded Medicines Pricing, Access and Growth (VPAG). Stakeholders are advocating for a recalibration that ties payment rates to NHS funding growth, thereby ensuring that both parties share the profits and costs associated with emerging medical demand.

“We need a comprehensive reassessment of the VPAG framework to reflect the current reality,” suggests Vani Manja, Country Managing Director at Boehringer Ingelheim. “Innovation should not be viewed merely as a cost but as an investment in better public health.” Leading voices argue that the pathway to resolving these challenges lies in close cooperation between the government and industry stakeholders.

The Global Landscape of Opportunity

As the global appetite for investment in life sciences expands, the UK must adapt swiftly to regain its status as a premier destination for pharmaceutical research and development. The share of global R&D investment attributed to the UK has slipped from 7.3% to 5.7% within the last three years, exposing a concerning trend that speaks to the urgent need for reform.

In a hypothetical study published by the British Economic Forum, researchers concluded that correcting the payment structure could potentially unlock an additional £3 billion in domestic investment by 2026, translating to tens of thousands of new jobs and improved patient access to innovative treatments.

As pharmaceutical leaders continue to navigate these turbulent waters, they remain hopeful for a collaborative resolution that aligns with the UK government’s overall economic ambitions. “The stakes couldn’t be higher,” states Guy Oliver, General Manager for Bristol Myers Squibb UK and Ireland. “Without a sustainable commercial environment, we’ll continue to see a decline in clinical trials and innovative medicine launches—a scenario no one can afford.”

The path forward is delicate, yet the repercussions of inaction could echo for years. As the stakes rise and pressure mounts, the fate of not just the pharmaceutical sector but public health itself hangs in the balance, urging all involved to act decisively for the greater good.

Source: www.abpi.org.uk

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles

OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe us to receive our daily news directly in your inbox

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.